PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121015 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 23 '17 at 00:45 |
Run Duration | 237 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
PNY(196E 0973) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.92
|
8.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
83%
Excellent
|
|||
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
43.2%
Average
|
|||
WD WD1200JD-00HBC0 120GB
62GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
|
30.3%
Below average
|
|||
52.9%
Above average
|
||||
50.2%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 37x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 5x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 3x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 3x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $805 |