PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z440 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212B |
Memory | 27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150609 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 23 '17 at 00:28 |
Run Duration | 234 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
85.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 3690) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
83.3%
Excellent
|
|||
72.9%
Very good
|
||||
Kingston DataTraveler G3 16GB
2GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
6.64%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
87.1%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,235x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 1,033x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 859x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 739x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 374x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 223x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |