PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160913 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 22 '17 at 02:04 |
Run Duration | 295 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
84.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$60
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
|||
USB DISK 2.0 2GB
2GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
5.52%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 4000 C19 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
31.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6850KIntel $120Bench 84%, 29,279 samples | 292x |
Core i7-6950XIntel $508Bench 87%, 6,135 samples | 245x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 127x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 180x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 174x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 61x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $1,589 |