| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 6.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP Z200 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B40h |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, , |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100506 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 21 '17 at 16:43 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
|
67%
Good
|
62% 100 Pts
|
34% 254 Pts
|
16% 259 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI FirePro V4800 (FireGL V)
HP(103C 2306) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.911.3.1000
|
6.32%
Terrible
|
6% 7.52 fps
|
6% 7.68 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505CUA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
28.3%
Poor
|
32% 144 MB/s
|
45% 13.2 MB/s
|
10% 16.2 MB/s
|
|
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
498GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
35% 27.7 MB/s
|
17% 0.2 MB/s
| |
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 240 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z200 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 58x |
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 37x |
| Xeon X3450IntelBench 66%, 3,425 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 19x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| 860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 11x |
| 860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 10x |
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $152 |