Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics63.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 14:22
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 151
2-Core 296
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 825
81% 661 Pts
64-Core 825
51% 825 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2123 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
Lighting 78.7
Reflection 80
Parallax 68.6
64% 75.8 fps
MRender 75.3
Gravity 74.1
Splatting 74.2
61% 74.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
198GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 346
Mixed 350
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 24.9
140% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 69.9
111% 215 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 118%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,621
Write 1,154
Mixed 1,355
375% 1,710 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 29.1
196% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 53
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 24.8
79% 159 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 242%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
2TB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 166
Mixed 9.11
82% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.28
83% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
772GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 90.4
Mixed 101
75% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.3
100% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
772GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 111
Write 89.8
Mixed 107
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.3
103% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 83%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
679GB free
Firmware: 04.05G09 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 95.9
Write 87
Mixed 78.6
65% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.38
4K Mixed 0.46
118% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 28.4
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 30.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback