ADD TO PC
BUILD

Packard EasyNote TJ77

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Packard EasyNote TJ77 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TJ77
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100504
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '17 at 09:16
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 64.7 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 78.5 42% 65.2 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 135 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 14,621 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 033D) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB 3,574 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 90 90 833230376642 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 -124893353997463 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1314 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 65 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 833230376642 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 833230376642 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 833230376642 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 -46849503264668 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3451 (EA) Unknown 0 0 4077 (F1) Unknown 0 0 4077 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6859	30.2% Below average	Read 237 Write 70.8 Mixed 116 31% 141 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 8.73 43% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 98.1 DQ Write 72.6 DQ Mixed 31.1 38% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 70%
Fujitsu MHV2120BH 120GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 96GB free Firmware: 00000029 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 45636 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 31784960 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 6346 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8585639690241 (07) Seek error rate 100 61 1293 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 44859675 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 6213 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 183 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 219797 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 257698693150 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 272 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 13334413313 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 6083 (CB) Run out cancel 100 100 3732297415673 (F0) Head flying hours 200 200 0	21% Poor	Read 37.9 Write 35.2 Mixed 35.2 27% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.29 70% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 2x2GB 1,156 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback