User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemEXPER ULTRANOTE
MotherboardEXPER W54CZ
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130409
Uptime7 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 05:43
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Celeron 1007U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
SC Int 34.8
SC Float 39.3
SC Mixed 39.6
30% 37.9 Pts
QC Int 69.9
QC Float 76.7
QC Mixed 51.6
15% 66.1 Pts
MC Int 71.7
MC Float 59.3
MC Mixed 63.7
10% 64.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5410) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4
1% 4.37 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 3
Splatting 7.3
2% 5.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
241GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 66.1
Mixed 61.3
50% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.27
66% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Nanya M2S2G64CB88G4N-CG 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.2% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.6
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $88
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $112
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $40
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback