Gigabyte GA-Z87X-OC-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-OC
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-OC-CF (all builds)
Memory	29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '17 at 05:24
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3258-$31 23,497 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 93 2-Core 186 73% 124 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 186 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 185 11% 185 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Lighting 63.2 Reflection 67.5 Parallax 79.8 52% 70.2 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 60.4 Splatting 55.5 50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7097 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 94 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 55 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 50 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13004555087	83.7% Excellent	Read 499 Write 396 Mixed 407 96% 434 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 25.2 84% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 126 142% 244 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3343 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 335 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 61 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 1 1 162238 (EB) Unknown 99 99 44 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4053547617	83.8% Excellent	Read 502 Write 396 Mixed 404 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 26.5 85% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 105 129% 229 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 853GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2241 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2994 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3340 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1129 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 338 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2655 (C2) HDA temperature 116 106 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	93.4% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 156 Mixed 140 116% 155 MB/s	4K Read 1.24 4K Write 2.72 4K Mixed 0.37 143% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GBH2X04E99927-15 0118 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 0118 8GBH2X04E99927-15 0118 8GBH2X04F1AA28-15 32GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	62.4% Good	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 20.9 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 21 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-OC-CF Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-OC-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	180x
Core i5-4670KIntel $127Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	45x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	41x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	16x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	10x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $331

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16