Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 142%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 04:54
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700K-$309
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
106% Outstanding
SC Int 148
SC Float 153
SC Mixed 151
120% 151 Pts
QC Int 518
QC Float 516
QC Mixed 516
117% 516 Pts
MC Int 729
MC Float 818
MC Mixed 786
116% 778 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$239
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2123 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Lighting 227
Reflection 197
Parallax 212
66% 212 fps
MRender 158
Gravity 209
Splatting 157
81% 175 fps
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$139
198GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 510
Write 347
Mixed 356
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 26.1
143% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 47.6
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 72.5
76% 119 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 96%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$128
15GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,758
Write 1,250
Mixed 1,332
390% 1,780 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 31.2
203% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 576
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 79.5
176% 364 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 268%
Great: 260%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 164
Mixed 135
117% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.36
107% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 107%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
771GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 52
Write 90.5
Mixed 79.6
56% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.13
44% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
771GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 59.1
Write 94.6
Mixed 72.7
57% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.09
38% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 84%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
679GB free
Firmware: 04.05G09 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 96.7
Write 89.4
Mixed 91.1
70% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.43
4K Mixed 0.32
104% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$133
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 28.6
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 29
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 788 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $142

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,069
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $96
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $260Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $136
Intel Core i5-7600K $224Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $239Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $165
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $132SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback