User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSONEVIEW AIO 1851
MotherboardAMD AMD CRB
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100521
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 04:44
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Athlon Neo X2 Dual Core L325
Socket AM2/S1G2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
SC Int 31.5
SC Float 22.3
SC Mixed 25.9
21% 26.6 Pts
QC Int 61.8
QC Float 42.4
QC Mixed 50
12% 51.4 Pts
MC Int 63.2
MC Float 42.6
MC Mixed 52.3
8% 52.7 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 13%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500
Device(1B7D 0002) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 3.7
1% 4.23 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$38
277GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 73.4
Write 52.3
Mixed 23.4
36% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.24
4K Mixed 0.19
56% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16HTF25664HY-800J2 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $233AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $125
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $297Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $243Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $169
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $144SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback