Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
11 months ago, 6 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 15 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 3 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 04:42
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4770K-$440
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.55 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.3% Poor
SC Int 45.2
SC Float 46.3
SC Mixed 44.9
36% 45.5 Pts
QC Int 159
QC Float 162
QC Mixed 134
34% 152 Pts
MC Int 229
MC Float 243
MC Mixed 241
36% 238 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2827) ≥ 4GB
MaxC: 1336 MHz, MaxM: 1877 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Lighting 80.6
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 120
29% 90.7 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 160
Splatting 94.2
61% 126 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 51%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$224
93GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 374
Write 353
Mixed 299
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 21.7
99% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 69.8
78% 135 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2666 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 2667 MHz clocked @ 2080 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
40.7% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $332

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,649
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $310AMD RX 480 $190Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $94
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $370Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $130
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $235Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $110SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $430SanDisk Extreme 32GB $26
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback