Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
18 months ago, 13 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 04:40
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4770K-$445
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.55 GHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
20.1% Poor
SC Int 45.2
SC Float 36.4
SC Mixed 25.7
29% 35.8 Pts
QC Int 93.1
QC Float 105
QC Mixed 97.7
22% 98.6 Pts
MC Int 205
MC Float 198
MC Mixed 199
30% 201 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2827) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1336 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.8% Average
Lighting 80.6
Reflection 76.1
Parallax 118
29% 91.7 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 159
Splatting 92.4
55% 125 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 52%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$299
93GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 377
Write 366
Mixed 356
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 21.8
98% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 59.6
70% 122 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2666 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 2667 MHz clocked @ 2080 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
38.6% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $535

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,525
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $394Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $950SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback