To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 04:37
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$56
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
22.1% Poor
SC Int 70
SC Float 40.2
SC Mixed 43.4
41% 51.2 Pts
QC Int 122
QC Float 67
QC Mixed 93.3
21% 94.1 Pts
MC Int 133
MC Float 76.9
MC Mixed 102
16% 104 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
XFX(1682 3264) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 72.4
Parallax 99.6
27% 83.4 fps
MRender 51.7
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 75
26% 62.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 30%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
531GB free
Firmware: SC23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5900 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 16.2
60% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 0.47
4K Mixed 0.17
59% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST3160310AS 160GB
5GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
40% Average
Read 78.7
Write 60.8
Mixed 35.4
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.29
64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40%
Great: 52%
Seagate External 2TB
382GB free, PID 3332
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 24.5
Mixed 11.2
24% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.19
41% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 1,683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $81
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $288Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $240Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $200Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $189SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $195SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback