Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160531
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '17 at 04:36
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.20GHz 680 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 79.5 2-Core 140 59% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 574 50% 426 Pts	64-Core 1,390 86% 1,390 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.8% Good	Lighting 76.6 Reflection 78.4 Parallax 72.6 62% 75.9 fps	MRender 77.7 Gravity 72.1 Splatting 64.3 58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 374GB free Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 51 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 327 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 48 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 56 188980133923 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 408449874 (F7) Unknown 100 100 12799714 (F8) Unknown 100 100 758039 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1944 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	61.9% Good	Read 471 Write 337 Mixed 341 85% 383 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 18.4 60% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 14.6 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 42 45% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 99%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 703 Write 525 Mixed 552 132% 594 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 21.7 78% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 86.8 99% 170 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 236%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 375GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 5 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 82 5298 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1390 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4472 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1449 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 15 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 57 197569544221 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 98 98 1459 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 431 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1552	70.2% Very good	Read 126 Write 118 Mixed 124 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.53 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 77%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 76GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 82 82 6150 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1199 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 341 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 677 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 62 353697813 (C2) HDA temperature 78 62 370475030 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 358235 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	41.9% Average	Read 70.4 Write 75.5 Mixed 74.6 56% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.26 64% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 59%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 160GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 102 Write 92.3 Mixed 52.7 100% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.35 67% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161 35,811 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.1% Good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 20.7 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 14.9 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 89.1 45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD3-CF Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	188x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	27x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	40x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	17x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	14x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	7x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 2,352 samples	6x
8ATF51264AZ-2G1A1 4x4GBMicronBench 91%, 1,465 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $585

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16