Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
20 months ago, 15 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 04:32
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4770K-$490
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.55 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
32% Below average
SC Int 44.1
SC Float 47.1
SC Mixed 45.3
36% 45.5 Pts
QC Int 159
QC Float 155
QC Mixed 156
36% 157 Pts
MC Int 228
MC Float 243
MC Mixed 240
36% 237 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 32%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2827) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1341 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 80.5
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 119
29% 92.4 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 160
Splatting 93.8
55% 126 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 52%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$199
93GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 374
Write 346
Mixed 289
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 19.9
94% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 53
68% 124 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2666 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 2667 MHz clocked @ 2080 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $535

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,853
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $280Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $294AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $110
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback