EVGA 132-CK-NF78

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemNVIDIA 132-CK-NF78
MotherboardEVGA 132-CK-NF78  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 04:02
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$270
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
45% Average
SC Int 82.6
SC Float 48.4
SC Mixed 61.3
51% 64.1 Pts
QC Int 319
QC Float 186
QC Mixed 234
56% 247 Pts
MC Int 322
MC Float 187
MC Mixed 235
38% 248 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gainward(10B0 1187) 2GB
MaxC: 1293 MHz, MaxM: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Lighting 73.3
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 99.4
25% 83.8 fps
MRender 82.9
Gravity 86.9
Splatting 76
42% 81.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 39%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$149
16GB free
Firmware: X411
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port
43% Average
Read 217
Write 137
Mixed 140
36% 165 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 12.5
78% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 93.3
DQ Write 51.1
DQ Mixed 27.2
32% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 43%
Great: 86%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
24GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
4KALIGNED
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 64.3
Write 95.5
Mixed 73.7
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.32
90% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 64%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$45
5GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
4KALIGNED
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 39.1
Write 40.2
Mixed 39.1
30% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.36
85% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 44%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
95GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.3% Below average
Read 81.2
Write 73.7
Mixed 7.18
61% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.19
56% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 34%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB
48GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 77.9
Write 89.2
Mixed 56.4
95% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.17
70% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
30GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 107
Write 41.5
Mixed 47
71% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.32
4K Write 2.63
4K Mixed 1
139% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 4.2
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 6
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 132-CK-NF78 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $481
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $106
Intel Core i5-7600K $229AMD RX 480 $220Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $140
Intel Pentium G4560 $60Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $219Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $170
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $122SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 64GB $35
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $137SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $9
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback