Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '17 at 04:00
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 75.8 1-Core 115 2-Core 233 78% 141 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 866 79% 663 Pts	64-Core 1,273 79% 1,273 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36B6) CLim: 1664 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 126 Parallax 125 102% 126 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 112 Splatting 103 88% 108 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 235GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1419 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 710 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 162 (C2) HDA temperature 67 61 167504904225 (F1) Unknown 100 100 186663	71.3% Very good	Read 515 Write 350 Mixed 356 90% 407 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 46.7 4K Mixed 9.49 78% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 46.7 66% 123 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 101%
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB 979 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 15GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 11878407 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 -93716186380549 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2472 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 3963 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 11878407 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 11878407 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 11878407 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18494 (EA) Unknown 0 0 19162 (F1) Unknown 0 0 19162 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20403	64.1% Good	Read 513 Write 133 Mixed 189 60% 279 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 15 100% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 38.8 58% 111 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 77%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 312GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 300 (03) Spinup time 186 170 5675 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6779 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19515 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5723 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2873 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 153 153 143484 (C2) HDA temperature 121 111 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	51.4% Above average	Read 95.8 Write 83.3 Mixed 81.5 65% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.2 71% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C 1x16GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	47.7% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 14.1 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 18.2 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)