EVGA 132-CK-NF78

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemNVIDIA 132-CK-NF78
MotherboardEVGA 132-CK-NF78  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091230
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 03:52
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$270
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.3% Average
SC Int 80.8
SC Float 48.2
SC Mixed 60.6
51% 63.2 Pts
QC Int 321
QC Float 187
QC Mixed 238
57% 249 Pts
MC Int 318
MC Float 188
MC Mixed 237
38% 248 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gainward(10B0 1187) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 73
Reflection 79.2
Parallax 99.8
26% 84 fps
MRender 82.8
Gravity 86.8
Splatting 76.3
35% 82 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 40%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$130
16GB free
Firmware: X411
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port
38.6% Below average
Read 200
Write 117
Mixed 128
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 11.1
71% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 85.3
DQ Write 47.8
DQ Mixed 24.6
30% 52.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 84%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
24GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
4KALIGNED
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 63.9
Write 95.6
Mixed 67.8
57% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.43
105% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 64%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$29
5GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
4KALIGNED
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 40.4
Mixed 39.3
30% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.39
89% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 44%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
95GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32% Below average
Read 81.7
Write 73.4
Mixed 7.72
62% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.18
53% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 34%
WD My Passport 259F 2TB
48GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 79.7
Write 89.5
Mixed 60.4
98% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.19
68% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
30GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
33% Below average
Read 107
Write 38.3
Mixed 46.9
69% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 2.63
4K Mixed 1
139% 2.61 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 4.1
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 132-CK-NF78 Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $538
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $395Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $98
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $121
Intel Core i5-7600K $222Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $153
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $785SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $157SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback