Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 01:24
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-8320-$104
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
SC Int 89.1
SC Float 75.5
SC Mixed 83.4
66% 82.7 Pts
QC Int 245
QC Float 214
QC Mixed 227
52% 229 Pts
MC Int 376
MC Float 322
MC Mixed 370
54% 356 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$522
Asus(1043 04A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.2.1
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Lighting 210
Reflection 142
Parallax 318
77% 223 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 216
Splatting 164
71% 164 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 88%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$185
332GB free
Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 127%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 4,124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $810
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $263Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $56HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback