Clevo W240BU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 3.58%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemClevo W240BU  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W240BU
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110721
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 01:08
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD C-50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.58% Terrible
SC Int 8.7
SC Float 4.2
SC Mixed 5.2
5% 6.03 Pts
QC Int 15.9
QC Float 13.4
QC Mixed 17.5
4% 15.6 Pts
MC Int 18
MC Float 12.3
MC Mixed 24.3
3% 18.2 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 7%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250
Clevo(1558 4510) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.3
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2.5
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9SA00 320GB
75GB free
Firmware: PB3O Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 38.3
Write 39.2
Mixed 34.7
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.17
32% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown MD03EU1063M 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.84% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.6
7% 2.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 0.5
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical W240BU Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

System: Clevo W240BU

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $130
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $176AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $183SanDisk Extreme 64GB $70
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $957SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $193SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback