Lenovo 30A8000NUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30A8000NUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 01:06
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 642
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420
Nvidia(10DE 1106) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 4.47
4% 4.33 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 5.07
Splatting 7.04
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPU256HCGL-000L1 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM65L1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
925GB free
Firmware: CC62 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 190
Mixed 149
129% 173 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.42
123% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965600-012.A02G 2x16GB
2 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 12.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback