Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 00:50
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 156
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 446
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74%
Great: 68%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
EVGA(3842 1430) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.41
4% 4.24 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 0915) 1GB
CLim: 820 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 1.84
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.91
2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.1% Good
Lighting 83
Reflection 79.4
Parallax 68.4
68% 76.9 fps
MRender 71.9
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 74.2
60% 73.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 500
Write 388
Mixed 406
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 17.7
94% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 32.4
DQ Write 46.5
DQ Mixed 17.1
19% 32 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 73%
Great: 134%
WD WD10EUCX-63YZ1Y0 1TB
44GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 71.4
Write 62
Mixed 69.7
51% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.17
58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 2400 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 21.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 14.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback