User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 29%
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemCCE Capella & IbexPeak-M Chipset
MotherboardCCE Calpella CRB
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMar 21 '17 at 00:35
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5 M 450
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
28.8% Poor
SC Int 40.3
SC Float 59.7
SC Mixed 61.5
43% 53.8 Pts
QC Int 92
QC Float 106
QC Mixed 113
24% 104 Pts
MC Int 128
MC Float 135
MC Mixed 132
20% 132 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Intel(8086 0046) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2
1% 1.9 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 2.2
1% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$40
311GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 53
Mixed 25.4
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.25
58% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
1 of 2 slots used
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
Intel Core i7-7700K $290Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $149
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $189AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $131
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $198SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback