User System

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	GBT___ GBTUACPI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121022
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '17 at 22:56
Run Duration	1394 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 137 60% 97.9 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 406 41% 333 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1225 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 34 21% 30 fps	MRender 26.8 Gravity 23.1 Splatting 36.3 24% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 14365047 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 27496380635359 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1252 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 181 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 51 38658048024 (C2) HDA temperature 24 51 38658048024 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 14365047 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 14365047 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 14365047 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11932 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5365 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5365 (F2) Unknown 0 0 5597 (F4) Unknown 98 98 5570643	37.8% Below average	Read 248 Write 109 Mixed 129 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 12.9 64% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 83.3 DQ Mixed 11.7 21% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 73%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 389GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 190 188 6500 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3661 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7044 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2815 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1284 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 152 152 145813 (C2) HDA temperature 121 101 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1803 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.4% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 89.8 Mixed 25.4 51% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.3 80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 54%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 295GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 89 35728063 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5524 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 177225344 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10731 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2751 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1386 (BC) Unknown 100 83 73 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 47 437387290 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 115 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 46 46 109408 (C2) HDA temperature 26 53 21474836506 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 47 35728063 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	39.9% Below average	Read 70.8 Write 68.4 Mixed 32.1 42% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 0.63 4K Mixed 0.21 44% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 43%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 500GB 479 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 464GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Read 0.93 Write 0.82 Mixed 0.87 1% 0.88 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.21 26% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	44.6% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 15.3 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.7 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)