Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	9.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121015
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '17 at 22:47
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 70 2-Core 138 62% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 427 43% 349 Pts	64-Core 432 27% 432 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% PNY(196E 0973) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.70 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.8% Terrible	Lighting 10.9 Reflection 9.88 Parallax 12.8 9% 11.2 fps	MRender 14.9 Gravity 13.3 Splatting 14.2 12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.8% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 238GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6916 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 25 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 14 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5473223370	83.6% Excellent	Read 491 Write 370 Mixed 229 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 31.1 116% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 31.2 50% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 134%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 466GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 165 160 4725 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5289 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 21 21 58065 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 331 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 249 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 169 169 95608 (C2) HDA temperature 119 101 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.4% Average	Read 63.9 Write 83.6 Mixed 65.2 53% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.35 103% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 49%
WD WD1200JD-00HBC0 120GB 1,007 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 62GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 189 0 (03) Spinup time 168 166 4116 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4081 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 3 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 2 2 71840 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2216 (C2) HDA temperature 115 96 35 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	27% Poor	Read 46.1 Write 47.5 Mixed 39.6 33% 44.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.44 104% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 32%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$140 3,296 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 38GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 130 124 6016 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6395 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 26 26 54369 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2174 (C2) HDA temperature 119 93 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.9% Above average	Read 79.7 Write 97 Mixed 78.2 64% 85 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3.24 4K Mixed 0.57 140% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 33%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$140 3,296 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 38GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 132 124 5925 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7971 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 26 26 54341 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2182 (C2) HDA temperature 118 88 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.9% Average	Read 63.2 Write 99.6 Mixed 83.3 62% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 3.04 4K Mixed 0.48 129% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.9% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 16.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 63%

Destroyer

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	37x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	5x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	3x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
T25 31TBTeamBench 58%, 15 samples	3x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	4x
99U5403-159.A01LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 52%, 29 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $805

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16