Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '17 at 22:31
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 284
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 798
82% 664 Pts
64-Core 799
50% 799 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2096 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.7% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 78
Parallax 68.3
64% 75.1 fps
MRender 73.5
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 72.9
60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
147GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 506
Write 347
Mixed 350
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 25.7
142% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 44.6
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 66
73% 116 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 118%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,549
Write 1,257
Mixed 1,361
378% 1,722 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 33.8
203% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 599
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 199
239% 419 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 261%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
2TB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.87% Terrible
Read 3.03
Write 27.9
Mixed 8.41
10% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.26
4K Mixed 0.05
12% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
772GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 52.3
Write 86
Mixed 66.7
52% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.14
43% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
772GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 48
Write 85.9
Mixed 71.5
52% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.15
43% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 83%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
683GB free
Firmware: 04.05G09 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 89
Mixed 70.5
66% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.48
120% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 26
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.7
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $664
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback