Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateMar 20 '17 at 20:55
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.1% Excellent
SC Int 113
SC Float 117
SC Mixed 113
92% 115 Pts
QC Int 374
QC Float 386
QC Mixed 387
87% 382 Pts
MC Int 881
MC Float 928
MC Mixed 936
137% 915 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$550
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.66
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Poor: 81% Great: 143%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$275
592GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 116%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$200
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 115
Write 141
Mixed 121
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 5.27
4K Mixed 0.56
180% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 45.2
127% 44.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 23.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 56.4
71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 78%
Workstation 74%

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,621
The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $330Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
Intel Core i7-7700K $289Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $335Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $149
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $189AMD RX 480 $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $131
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $198SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $931SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $51Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 16GB $18
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback