Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '17 at 20:46
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 254
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 774
74% 611 Pts
64-Core 775
48% 775 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 465
Nvidia(10DE 0839) 1GB
CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 801 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 16.8
13% 18.6 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 18.3
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,635
Write 1,325
Mixed 1,389
392% 1,783 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 48.1
206% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 480
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 158
173% 296 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 265%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
372GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 410
Mixed 421
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 46.5
169% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 114
135% 237 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
Patriot Blaze 60GB-$62
56GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 433
Write 173
Mixed 248
62% 285 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 5.95
88% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 84.7
DQ Mixed 1.83
30% 72.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0511
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
23% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 37.5
Mixed 34.4
28% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 5.72
4K Mixed 0.68
234% 2.56 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 152
Write 154
Mixed 150
115% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.17
57% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
73% Very good
Read 135
Write 119
Mixed 87.9
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
113% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$160
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.5% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $910
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback