Asrock Z77 Extreme9

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121128
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '17 at 17:12
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$194 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 162 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 417 44% 350 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% EVGA(3842 2888) 3GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.3% Average	Lighting 58.8 Reflection 23.2 Parallax 71.2 48% 51.1 fps	MRender 67 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 47.1 49% 61.9 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6543 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 718 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 232 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1572917 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 402 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 76 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5668	62% Good	Read 376 Write 311 Mixed 372 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 12.2 89% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 73.8 DQ Mixed 12.4 20% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 94%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 180GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 130079928 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1051 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 8625152916 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5744 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 645 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 72 55 488177692 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 186 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 22212 (C2) HDA temperature 28 45 42949672988 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -84323092918688 (F1) Unknown 100 253 30882276544 (F2) Unknown 100 253 170943816248	85.8% Excellent	Read 167 Write 131 Mixed 119 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 5.34 4K Mixed 0.6 194% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46 8,198 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 42GB free Firmware: P22OABEA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 3 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 129 129 12894994586 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2622 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 65 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18559 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2200 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3249 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3249 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 227633528860 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 80 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	37.2% Below average	Read 69.4 Write 60.1 Mixed 64.8 49% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.3 79% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 122,541 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 20.3 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme9

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	25x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	17x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	9x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 24GBUnknownBench 45%, 8 samples	6x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $506

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16