| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H81M-HG4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131206 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 20 '17 at 15:28 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 96% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
64.3%
Good
|
71% 121 Pts
|
32% 250 Pts
|
16% 262 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57%
Above average
|
56% 67.6 fps
|
59% 71.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
432GB free
Firmware: SC23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
78.7%
Very good
|
103% 137 MB/s
|
69% 0.67 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
53%
Above average
|
68% 90.5 MB/s
|
87% 0.55 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.3%
Above average
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
59% 67.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-HG4 Builds (Compare 205 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HG4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 35x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 28x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 33x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 27x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $102 |