Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70 10,987 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 142 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 274 37% 274 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6750M 168 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Apple(106B 6741) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.2.0.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.65% Terrible	Lighting 6.83 Reflection 6.85 Parallax 5.38 6% 6.35 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 8.83 6% 6.85 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.65% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 11GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 1.99 Mixed 3.05 7% 7.82 MB/s	4K Read 3.23 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.003 12% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.8 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16