Asus X99-A II

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 0 old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).

Motherboard	Asus X99-A II (all builds)
Memory	29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '17 at 13:19
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$374 22,077 User benchmarks - Average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	SC Int 77 SC Float 82 SC Mixed 87.7 66% 82.2 Pts	QC Int 389 QC Float 345 QC Mixed 342 81% 358 Pts	MC Int 762 MC Float 822 MC Mixed 820 120% 801 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 870 User benchmarks - Average bench 39% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	40.7% Average	Lighting 125 Reflection 105 Parallax 120 37% 116 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 111 Splatting 89.3 53% 103 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$195 11,770 User benchmarks - Average bench 102% 337GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1264 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 602 (B1) Unknown 99 99 23 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 58 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 227 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22519901293	100% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 491 Mixed 457 109% 488 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 34.3 130% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 116 117% 189 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 125%
Toshiba MD04ABA400V 4TB 15 User benchmarks - Average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP1T Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5200 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 23 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 23 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 25 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 154620067871 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 19 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 718 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	85.1% Excellent	Read 148 Write 149 Mixed 38.7 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.25 119% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 88%
Toshiba MD04ABA400V 4TB 15 User benchmarks - Average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: FP1T Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s NCQ 5400 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5350 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 20 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 23 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 22 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 154620067873 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 21 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 737 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	74.4% Very good	Read 134 Write 126 Mixed 46.8 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.14 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.16 38% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$239 697 User benchmarks - Average bench 82% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 43 MC Mixed 40.3 118% 41.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 21.1 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 107%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $220

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $330Bench 92%, 8,780 samples	1,073x
Core i7-6850KIntel $360Bench 97%, 4,468 samples	280x
Core i7-5820KIntel $374Bench 86%, 22,077 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $550Bench 126%, 75,800 samples	441x
GTX 1070Nvidia $380Bench 100%, 125,269 samples	395x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $269Bench 71%, 82,026 samples	136x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $165Bench 97%, 88,772 samples	227x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $97Bench 96%, 143,814 samples	197x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $350Bench 223%, 18,256 samples	189x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 73%, 3,220 samples	147x
2x8GBUnknownBench 51%, 17,025 samples	65x
2x16GBUnknownBench 68%, 514 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,265

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295	Nvidia GTX 1070 $380	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $268	AMD RX 480 $410	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $235	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $269	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $165

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $137	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $714	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $23
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $44	HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $128	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13