Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3417-A2
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151112
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '17 at 08:50
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 1,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 221 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 571 56% 458 Pts	64-Core 638 40% 638 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.82 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 18.6 18% 19.1 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 19.9 Splatting 16.3 16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsun MZ7LN256HCHP-000 256GB 290 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5150 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 417 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 27 (AE) Unknown 99 99 11 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 778 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 57 37 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 16550722 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2851 (F2) Unknown 99 99 4225 (F9) Unknown 99 99 6912	77.9% Very good	Read 515 Write 280 Mixed 323 82% 373 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 18.7 125% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 31.1 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 18 35% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 635GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 81158336 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14539 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2221767 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5136 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 415 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 58 521666591 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 15 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 25730 (C2) HDA temperature 31 42 60129542175 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 18975165514316 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2435045070 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4990542308	96% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 147 Mixed 163 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.23 95% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 112%
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB 3,473 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 196GB free Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4273 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 766871531 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 11623 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4112 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 1196 (BE) vendor-specific 69 42 189952622623 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 172 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2478 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 220252 (C2) HDA temperature 31 58 64424509471 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 60 46 78351678 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	32.9% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 56.2 Mixed 54.6 42% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.31 68% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 8,407 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	73.8% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 23.5 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 21 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS_W550 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS_W550

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	30x
Xeon E3-1245 v5IntelBench 76%, 2,081 samples	22x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	10x

GPU
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	11x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	10x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	7x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	9x
TS128GSSD230S 128GBTranscendBench 83%, 2,263 samples	6x
MZ7TY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 89%, 796 samples	4x

RAM
M378A1G43EB1-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB 16GBSamsungBench 76%, 102 samples	5x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	5x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16