Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 20 '17 at 03:26
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-6700K-$319
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
SC Int 135
SC Float 143
SC Mixed 138
111% 139 Pts
QC Int 513
QC Float 527
QC Mixed 519
118% 520 Pts
MC Int 694
MC Float 789
MC Mixed 754
112% 746 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti-$695
MaxC: 1911 MHz, MaxM: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Lighting 536
Reflection 510
Parallax 556
164% 534 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 504
Splatting 277
140% 350 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 163%
Great: 183%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 960 500GB
84GB free
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 206% Great: 319%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$119
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2473 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 26.6
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 27.4
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 88%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,026
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $368Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
Intel Core i5-7600K $229AMD RX 480 $227Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $132
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback