Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660 2,343 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Proc 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 76.2 1-Core 39.4 2-Core 78.8 43% 64.8 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 249 25% 203 Pts	64-Core 616 38% 616 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6.64 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 90%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 580 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 3600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	7.62% Terrible	Read 23.7 Write 12.7 Mixed 11.3 18% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.36 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.02 22% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.62% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 80GB 146 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	18% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 5 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 88 46% 88 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56601stBench 66%, 2,343 samples	4x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon X55501stBench 66%, 1,356 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 24%, 8,041 samples	2x
Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples	1x
GeForce 9600 GSONvidiaBench 5%, 1,167 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	2x
LOGICAL VOLUME 525GBHPBench 66%, 2 samples	1x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16