| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Fill Q7700 (all builds) |
| Memory | 27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130808 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 17 '17 at 13:56 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 45% |
PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
|
69.5%
Good
|
69% 118 Pts
|
41% 305 Pts
|
18% 297 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Zotac(19DA 3255) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
|
36.5%
Below average
|
36% 45.6 fps
|
38% 47.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
|
|
73.8%
Very good
|
68% 94.2 MB/s
|
109% 0.92 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MMXIV 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.5%
Average
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
57% 70.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Q7700 Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Fill Q7700
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470SIntelBench 65%, 14,631 samples | 2x |
| Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples | 1x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6570AMDBench 5%, 19,220 samples | 2x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 13% - Very poor | Total price: $33 |