Asus X99-E-10G WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E-10G WS (all builds)
Memory	56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161026
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '17 at 12:40
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 1,417 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 79.5 2-Core 169 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 688 61% 519 Pts	64-Core 1,324 82% 1,324 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% XFX(1682 3213) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.2.1 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.1% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 27.7 Parallax 50.7 32% 39.4 fps	MRender 27 Gravity 40.8 Splatting 35 28% 34.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
OCZ REVODRIVE350 240GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.50 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 199013725 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 -34016140968809 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 80 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 36 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 63 1009321443386 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 199013725 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 199013725 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 199013725 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 51319 (EA) Unknown 0 0 93701 (F1) Unknown 0 0 93701 (F2) Unknown 0 0 37447
Poor: 57% Great: 105%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 686GB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 8860 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 14 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 912 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 312 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 48 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 11 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 105 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 231929872435 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 85 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 246 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 209 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	57.8% Above average	Read 107 Write 94.1 Mixed 99 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.25 80% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 104%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 25GB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6943 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 572 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 1538 (0A) Spinup retry count 111 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 568 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 501 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 558 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 640 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 296354185260 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 1 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 97 97 1459 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 291 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	46.7% Average	Read 80.7 Write 82.2 Mixed 83.5 62% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.24 76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1B1 4x16GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	120% Outstanding	MC Read 55.7 MC Write 43.4 MC Mixed 45.3 138% 48.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 18.4 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E-10G WS Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus X99-E-10G WS

CPU
Core i7-6950XIntel $508Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	16x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	13x
Xeon E5-2690 v4IntelBench 76%, 795 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	24x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	8x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	6x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	6x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	5x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	5x

RAM
Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 8x8GBCorsairBench 124%, 153 samples	8x
M391A1K43BB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 34 samples	4x
16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 2x16GBMicronBench 73%, 274 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,176

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16