Toshiba SATELLITE L750D

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L750D (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Guam
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '17 at 23:25
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II P960 1,167 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Memory 40 1-Core 10.8 2-Core 40.1 20% 30.3 Pts	4-Core 78.3 8-Core 80.1 11% 79.2 Pts	64-Core 92.6 6% 92.6 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M 2,918 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FD50) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.93% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.34 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.93% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 274GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 65 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 62 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 17 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 47 227634249763 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1600736082 (F7) Unknown 100 100 50212725 (F8) Unknown 100 100 11892589 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1931 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	33.7% Below average	Read 253 Write 168 Mixed 180 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 10 35% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 64.1 DQ Write 40.9 DQ Mixed 22.4 25% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 99%
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127 6,562 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 308GB free Firmware: GT00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2922 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3055 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 776 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 37 37 25563 (0A) Spinup retry count 160 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2966 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 401 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 390 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 75 75 253448 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 266288889890 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 53 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 4146 (DE) Loaded hours 58 58 17018 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 327 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	40.7% Average	Read 72.9 Write 68.7 Mixed 64.6 52% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.27 77% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB 18,713 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.3 17% 5.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 202 20% 202 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE L750D Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L750D

CPU
A6-3400M APUAMDBench 35%, 3,654 samples	13x
A6-3420M APUAMDBench 36%, 4,510 samples	9x
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 6520GAMDBench 2%, 8,067 samples	21x
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6620GAMDBench 3%, 3,311 samples	4x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 37%, 2,099 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	2x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $20

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16