User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 151-HE-E999
Memory61 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '17 at 19:08
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 236
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 752
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 116
Parallax 97.4
95% 110 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 102
Splatting 103
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
466GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,308
Write 916
Mixed 1,041
242% 1,088 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 27
134% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 122
114% 166 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 156%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 390
Mixed 419
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 34.7
133% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 17.9
78% 177 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
851GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 142
Write 124
Mixed 124
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.48
132% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 45.9
MC Mixed 37.4
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback