Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '17 at 09:14
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 73.2 1-Core 118 2-Core 229 77% 140 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 824 77% 639 Pts	64-Core 1,259 78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36B6) CLim: 1644 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 125 Parallax 113 100% 120 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 113 Splatting 98.3 86% 106 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 480GB-$300 13,412 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1363 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 663 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 131 (C2) HDA temperature 68 61 167504904224 (F1) Unknown 100 100 179389	71.4% Very good	Read 513 Write 353 Mixed 353 90% 407 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 9.31 78% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 47.2 66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 101%
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB 979 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 15GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 107 15518967 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 120078695679686 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2435 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 3940 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 15518967 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 15518967 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 15518967 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 18484 (EA) Unknown 0 0 19158 (F1) Unknown 0 0 19158 (F2) Unknown 0 0 20355	60.7% Good	Read 495 Write 106 Mixed 182 56% 261 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 17.9 97% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 43 56% 102 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 77%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 699GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 300 (03) Spinup time 206 170 4700 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6736 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19460 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5680 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2846 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 153 153 143415 (C2) HDA temperature 121 111 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	58.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 103 Mixed 101 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.18 82% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C 1x16GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 12.6 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 16.4 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)