bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	64.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System
Motherboard	Intel DH61ZE
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111018
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '17 at 08:17
Run Duration	310 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 90.4 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 129 63% 100 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 153 22% 161 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2057 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.78 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Lighting 81.4 Reflection 79.9 Parallax 68.8 66% 76.7 fps	MRender 73 Gravity 73 Splatting 74 60% 73.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 762 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1819 (B1) Unknown 96 96 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 42 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 279 (EB) Unknown 99 99 120 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9274164776	49.2% Average	Read 252 Write 139 Mixed 144 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 19.7 80% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 90.6 DQ Mixed 51.4 62% 111 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 216GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 210 182 2475 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4115 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7735 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3226 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 308 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4115 (C2) HDA temperature 118 96 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59.9% Above average	Read 115 Write 93.9 Mixed 105 79% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.42 106% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 69%
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50 4,054 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 149GB free Firmware: HH100-06 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2982 (03) Spinup time 252 252 2000 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7365 (05) Reallocated sector count 1 1 1024 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 3800 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 26 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3444 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 6805 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 773 (C2) HDA temperature 166 91 214749282328 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3025 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 12 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 312 (C9) Soft read error rate 252 252 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 220 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 85 85 159592	36.2% Below average	Read 57.3 Write 68.7 Mixed 63.2 48% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.31 76% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 36%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,921 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 28GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	5.81% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 7.24 Mixed 9.9 14% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.22 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.01 20% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.81% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-668.A00LF 9905403-447.A00LF 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.2% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.4 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,022x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,566x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16