Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '17 at 04:42
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 101
50% 77.8 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 201
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 58.5
45% 56.4 fps
MRender 61.6
Gravity 55.9
Splatting 78.1
55% 65.2 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
104GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.3% Average
Read 192
Write 171
Mixed 160
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 16.4
79% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 44.2
DQ Mixed 16.6
18% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.7% Average
Read 194
Write 172
Mixed 166
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 14.6
77% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 14.5
18% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 115%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
339GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 124
Write 138
Mixed 102
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.89
4K Mixed 0.52
135% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback