Asrock X79 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '17 at 03:08
Run Duration546 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 150
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 538
50% 415 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 19
Parallax 19.8
30% 25 fps
MRender 32.5
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 26.6
24% 29.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2CW600G3 480GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 213
Write 182
Mixed 205
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 1.32
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 10.9
24% 8.94 MB/s
DQ Read 80.4
DQ Write 52.6
DQ Mixed 28.9
32% 53.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST91000641NS 1TB
982GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 103
Write 78.2
Mixed 65
61% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.58
129% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 56%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 4GB
1GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 3.98
Mixed 8.72
12% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.95
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 1.24
107% 2.82 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 12%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 4GB
1GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 3.48
Mixed 7.77
11% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.19
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.69
62% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G73BH0- 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 28.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme6 - $341

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $931
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback