Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAsus KGP(M)E-D16  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory9 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130219
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 12 '17 at 16:40
Run Duration460 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6320
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 106
52% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 377
33% 281 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 341.5
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 18.3
16% 17.8 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 16
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
148GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.8% Below average
Read 158
Write 142
Mixed 132
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 13.5
62% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 14.3
15% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.6% Below average
Read 176
Write 127
Mixed 127
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 13.4
65% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 37.5
DQ Mixed 14.3
16% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 118%
Hitachi UltraStar 7K4000 2TB
365GB free
Firmware: MJ6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 104
Mixed 56.9
64% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.21
89% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 2.83
Mixed 5.25
8% 8.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.08
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.93
70% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965426-079.A00LF 6x4GB
6 of 16 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.1% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 9.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $503
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback