Asrock Q77M vPro

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Q77M vPro (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '17 at 13:08
Run Duration	87 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 189 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 233 32% 236 Pts	64-Core 238 15% 238 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% XFX(1682 3113) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 16.9 15% 16.5 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 18.3 12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54 40,725 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0801A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 56 (A3) Unknown 100 100 12 (A4) Unknown 100 100 1716 (A5) Unknown 100 100 6 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 3 (94) Unknown 100 100 608 (95) Unknown 100 100 28 (96) Unknown 100 100 0 (97) Unknown 100 100 20 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 42 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5875 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4551 (F5) Unknown 100 100 27456	60.2% Good	Read 409 Write 285 Mixed 243 69% 313 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 12 83% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 81.2 DQ Mixed 11.8 21% 40.3 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C11-4GNS Samsung M391B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	56.4% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 17.9 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q77M vPro Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Q77M vPro

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	24x
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	11x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	10x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	10x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	3x

RAM
99U5471-040.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 2,012 samples	4x
9905403-439.A00LF 9905403-437.A01LF 12GBKingstonBench 49%, 3 samples	3x
KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/8GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX2400C11D3/8GX 32GBKingstonBench 52%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $507

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16