Gigabyte GA-Z77-HD3

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z77-HD3 (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121121
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '17 at 02:57
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 213 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 520 60% 466 Pts	64-Core 522 32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 375.95 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 122 Parallax 104 95% 114 fps	MRender 96.4 Gravity 106 Splatting 105 84% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 480GB-$277 5,507 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 296GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFC12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1694 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 240 (A2) Unknown 100 100 505 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65541 (AE) Unknown 100 100 12 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1348 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1782	53.4% Above average	Read 376 Write 263 Mixed 217 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 36 4K Mixed 9.45 71% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 64.1 DQ Mixed 11.1 19% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 100%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 55GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 -65498251260156 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 577 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 57 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 51 60132884512 (C2) HDA temperature 32 51 60132884512 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2455 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2191 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2191 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1413 (F4) Unknown 97 97 4522053	37% Below average	Read 193 Write 78.9 Mixed 116 28% 129 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 12.6 76% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 65.1 DQ Mixed 11.1 19% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 985GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 126 126 25789464878 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 255 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1643 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 230 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 260 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 260 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 227634380838 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	90.3% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 155 Mixed 4.79 76% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 0.22 110% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 108%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 25.3 Mixed 13.2 28% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.15 50% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLH-8G 2x8GB 905 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 17.9 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z77-HD3 Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77-HD3

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	88x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	62x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	25x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
Atermiter 0080 Atermiter 059B 99P5471-016.A00LF 24GBUnknownBench 50%, 9 samples	7x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16