Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '17 at 23:54
Run Duration382 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 202
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 323
48% 349 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 372.70
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 112
Parallax 98.9
116% 118 fps
MRender 99.7
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 103
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 475
Write 182
Mixed 203
62% 287 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 3.09
57% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 4.02
48% 116 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 70%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 105
Write 120
Mixed 114
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.05
14% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 86%
Generic External 160GB
99GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 41.6
Mixed 3.07
33% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.35
48% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Mass Storage Device 16GB
1GB free, PID 125c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 4.63
Mixed 4.73
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.08
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.97
78% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 19.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,081
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback