PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | BOXX 3DBOXX W8920 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X9DAi |
Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130805 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 11 '17 at 16:04 |
Run Duration | 587 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 335.23
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F7256R64F3186 8x2GB
8 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
86.1%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples | 2x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 2x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 6970AMDBench 20%, 9,594 samples | 1x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 1x |
R9 290XAMD $549Bench 51%, 37,353 samples | 1x |
SSD | |
---|---|
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples | 2x |
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 6% - Terrible | Total price: $132 |