PEAQ PNB C2015-I5N1

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	PEAQ PNB C2015-I5N1 (all builds)
Motherboard	PEAQ MA50LU
Memory	3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160413
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '17 at 13:10
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	41%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Memory 21.3 1-Core 12 2-Core 20.2 12% 17.8 Pts	4-Core 33.9 8-Core 34.3 5% 34.1 Pts	64-Core 34 2% 34 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Elitegroup(1019 9832) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.02% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.08 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.38 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.02% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSD PHISON 128GB PS3109-S9 534 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 95 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 53 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 28 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1703940 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 255112	18% Very poor	Read 150 Write 116 Mixed 149 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 6.55 4K Write 7.31 4K Mixed 2.4 17% 5.42 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 64%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 911GB free Firmware: AX1P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1762 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 52 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 87 (0A) Spinup retry count 101 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 52 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 11 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1188 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 176094642204 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 9 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 265 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	61.1% Good	Read 107 Write 106 Mixed 105 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.18 70% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF HMA425S6AFR6N-TF 6GB 963 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	20.2% Poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 311 13% 311 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

PEAQ PNB C2015-I5N1

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)