HP SLIC-CPC

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP SLIC-CPC (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Maureen
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20081205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '17 at 10:08
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X9100-$150 548 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	44.2% Average	Memory 74.2 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 86.5 44% 67.8 Pts	4-Core 85.6 8-Core 86.4 11% 86 Pts	64-Core 85.9 5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GS 1,033 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 900F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 327.2 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 3.54 Parallax 0.53 2% 2.01 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 3.22 3% 3.19 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk S060GG25 60GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 362A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4251194 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -15436112452057 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 953 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 177 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 4251194 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11904 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6144 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6144 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11008	14.9% Very poor	Read 122 Write 26.7 Mixed 59.8 15% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 5.66 4K Mixed 3.94 30% 7.91 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 46%
WDC WD25 00BEVS-60UST0 250GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 11GB free, PID 110c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 27.8 Mixed 28.5 37% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.32 75% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5.2 17% 5.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 91.9 44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SLIC-CPC Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP SLIC-CPC

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	4x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	2x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	6x
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	4x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	3x

SSD
SSD340 64GBTranscend $57Bench 53%, 207 samples	3x
S128G 126GBSandiskBench 42%, 21,984 samples	1x
X210 512GBSanDisk $152Bench 84%, 1,667 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	2x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	2x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $57

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16